Unfinished Business: The One Missing Piece
Subject:   Why leave out eDirectory?
Date:   2003-06-03 07:27:53
From:   anonymous2
Response to: Why leave out eDirectory?

There's a problem with this:

"Novell's DirXML product will synchronize eDirectory data stored on a Linux server with [AD] data *stored on a Windows server...*"

We want Linux/UNIX and legacy Windows desktops to connect to UNIX/Linux servers, so what's the point in giving companies an incentive to buy another Micro$oft server? Any Linux/UNIX directory service, if it is to be compatible with AD, needs to be able to run AD *itself*.

1 to 1 of 1
1 to 1 of 1