I appreciate the concern for accuracy, but stand behind David's claim that the CoS has been aggressive in enforcing copyright claims against Internet forums. It's incidental to the article, though.
As this topic is on the verge of veering woefully away from the issue of e-mail anonymity and privacy, may I recommend that all interested readers look into the matters for themselves? As the saga of anon.penet.fi involved legal action, there should be public records available.
There are also better fora to discuss copyright claims for religious documents, and I recommend taking that part of this discussion up there.