advertisement

Article:
  Readable Java 1.5
Subject:   interesting, but...
Date:   2003-09-25 11:44:47
From:   sjungels
Response to: interesting, but...

I wanted "in" also. The reason I didn't argue for it is that it's already used by System.in. Java compiler writers would have to do backflips to distinguish between an "in" keyword and "in" the member variable. So "in" is out, unfortunately.

1 to 2 of 2
1 to 2 of 2