Wireless Mesh Networking
Subject:   Ad-hoc mesh routing is not a silver bullet...
Date:   2004-01-23 02:06:30
From:   schuyler
Researchers on the Grid Project at MIT's Parallel and Distributed Operating Systems group have found that throughput can vary wildly. There are more details at, but I seem to recall reading that the conventional wisdom with ad-hoc mesh routing is that bandwidth varies with the inverse of the number of hops between nodes.

So ad-hoc routing may not be very useful for networks with an average width of more than about three hops. Cliff Skolnick suggests that mesh routing might be a part of an integrated solution for covering the distance between fixed point, long distance aggregation nodes and the hotspot in your house: the last five hundred feet or so, as it were.

Also, there's got to be better ways to pick out addresses on an ad-hoc mesh network than choosing them ahead of time. A Zeroconf-life solution comes to mind (pick an address deterministically, then ping to see if anyone's already on it, with a definite method for resolving contention) but no doubt the Grid folks already have three better ways of doing it already working in the lab...

1 to 1 of 1
  1. Ad-hoc mesh routing is not a silver bullet...
    2004-02-09 05:18:02  teq [View]

1 to 1 of 1