It's True! Jobs Switches to Intel: A Review of the WWDC 05 Keynote
Subject:   Intel umm..
Date:   2005-06-07 16:55:20
From:   Oyku
I keep asking myself the following questions.

1. Although I understand why Intel and not AMD from an enterprise and long term point of view, I wonder if guys at Seattle happy that they have a (theoretical) chance to hit Apple and hit hard on the same platform

2. Why would I go and buy a Pentium machine? I did not pay +xx% for the operating system only? How different will it be? Why wouldn't I settle to an AMD64 system.

3. Intel has lost market share to AMD in 64bit. What is the point in running Mac OS X on an Intel chip rather than running Linux on an AMD Opteron.

4. I'm disappointed, unhappy and I simply do not want an Intel CPU inside my mac. I wonder if they have done research on customer reaction? OR is Apple in trouble and had to settle with Intel. As Jobs said "a secret life for 5 years just in case" So this is plan B. and Apple believes they'll come over it as they did in their history twice.

5. Using a Mac for me is a preference. A mac user is not a mainstream user. Mac users feel special. So it'd have been cool to have AMD 64 and AMD Opteron rather than mainstream Pentium

1 to 2 of 2
  1. Intel umm..
    2005-06-08 11:44:50  NeuralizR [View]

    • Intel umm..
      2005-06-22 00:35:55  zanyterp [View]

      • Intel umm..
        2005-12-16 12:37:22  Randall311 [View]

  2. Intel umm..
    2005-06-07 16:56:56  Oyku [View]

1 to 2 of 2