ONJava.com -- The Independent Source for Enterprise Java
oreilly.comSafari Books Online.Conferences.

advertisement

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Article:
  Bean-Managed Transaction Suspension in J2EE
Subject:   Point?
Date:   2006-06-05 13:55:47
From:   ejbRules
Response to: Point?

No, it does not work as expected. Spring was broken 3 different times because the TM was changed in 3 different versions of WebSphere. Anyone that writes code that plays with the native TM is playing with fire.


Instead of going through all this stupid trouble to write non-standard code and to use hidden APIs one ought to just follow the EJB spec and use the transaction setting of "NotSupported" or "Never" then the developer will have portable code that works on any J2EE app server. Advocating to write directly to the TM is foolish and shows lack of experience. We lived through the days when people used hidden DOS 21h functions and seeing code break with new versions of DOS. This article does nothing more than advocate the same mistakes people made 20 years ago.


Stick to using EJBs they way they are meant to be used and you can have portable, transactional code just like is needed by the use cases stated and one does not have to take unnecessary risks to write code that will break one day (probably when a fix or new version is applied).



1 to 2 of 2
  1. Point?
    2006-10-12 01:59:06  toddiuszho [View]

  2. I think you're missed the point...
    2006-06-06 12:47:00  MaximDim [View]

1 to 2 of 2