Weblog:   The Growing Politicization of Open Source
Subject:   Linux and Politics
Date:   2002-08-18 05:44:02
From:   cmartinez4u
Response to: Linux and Politics

"no one wants to have their government,local or national, to dictate what the worksrs can cannot use to be productive at work."
Tell me one company that let their workers use what they want to be more productive?
Remember their trying to mandate:
- Free access to public information by the citizen.
- Permanence of public data.
- Security of the State and citizens.

To guarantee the free access of citizens to public information, it is indespensable that the encoding of data is not tied to a single provider. The use of standard and open formats gives a guarantee of this free access, if necessary through the creation of compatible free software.

To guarantee the permanence of public data, it is necessary that the usability and maintenance of the software does not depend on the goodwill of the suppliers, or on the monopoly conditions imposed by them. For this reason the State needs systems the development of which can be guaranteed due to the availability of the source code.

To guarantee national security or the security of the State, it is indispensable to be able to rely on systems without elements which allow control from a distance or the undesired transmission of information to third parties. Systems with source code freely accessible to the public are required to allow their inspection by the State itself, by the citizens, and by a large number of independent experts throughout the world. It will bring further security, since the knowledge of the source code will eliminate the growing number of programs with *spy code*.

Please read the "Peruvian congressman's open letter to Microsoft" it's a worldwide known masterpiece, that will answer all your questions about Open Source Movement and the Government.

1 to 1 of 1
  1. Linux and Politics
    2002-08-18 07:08:28  jsotack [View]

1 to 1 of 1